Samsung WB30F vs Sony T900
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Samsung WB30F vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB30F vs Sony T900 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Samsung WB30F vs Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the WB30F (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WB30F was introduced 3 years after the T900 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the WB30F grades versus the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Samsung WB30F vs Sony T900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB30F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung WB30F Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Sony T900
| WB30F | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Samsung WB30F
| T900 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung WB30F and Sony T900
| WB30F | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung WB30F vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung WB30F provides outside measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Samsung WB30F vs Sony T900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the WB30F against the T900.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB30F and T900 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Samsung WB30F vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through specifications. The picture below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WB30F and T900.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB30F to provide you with extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent WB30F provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung WB30F vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung WB30F vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Samsung WB30F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB30F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | QVGA TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 2s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 128 gr (0.28 lb) | 143 gr (0.32 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $180 | $300 |