Samsung WB35F vs Samsung WB850F
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Samsung WB35F vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung WB35F vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Samsung WB35F vs Samsung WB850F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and they are both manufactured by Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WB35F was announced 2 years after the WB850F which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the WB35F scores vs the WB850F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB35F vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB35F & Samsung WB850F. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung WB35F Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Samsung WB850F
| WB35F | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Samsung WB35F
| WB850F | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Samsung WB850F
| WB35F | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Samsung WB35F vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung WB35F offers external dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB850F has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB35F vs Samsung WB850F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the WB35F against the WB850F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB35F and WB850F is 93 and 91 respectively.
Samsung WB35F vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WB35F and WB850F.
As you can see, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you would want to take the age of the cameras into account. The more modern WB35F will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung WB35F vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Samsung WB35F vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Samsung WB35F | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung WB35F | Samsung WB850F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-01-07 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lb) | 250g (0.55 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | BP70A | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $130 | $599 |