Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Released February 2012
- Superseded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Newer Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Let's look much closer at the Samsung WB35F and Sigma DP2 Merrill, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is pretty similar but the WB35F (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WB35F was revealed 24 months after the DP2 Merrill which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the WB35F scores against the DP2 Merrill when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB35F & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung WB35F Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
WB35F | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | February 2012 | More modern by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Samsung WB35F
DP2 Merrill | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sigma DP2 Merrill
WB35F | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB35F has got outside measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung WB35F and Sigma DP2 Merrill in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the WB35F and the DP2 Merrill.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB35F and DP2 Merrill is 93 and 83 respectively.
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing specs. The picture here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WB35F and DP2 Merrill.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WB35F using its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung WB35F will deliver greater detail because of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer WB35F will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Samsung WB35F | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung WB35F | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-01-07 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/2.8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 640x480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 330 grams (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP70A | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $130 | $931 |