Clicky

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill

Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37
Samsung WB35F front
 
Sigma DP2 Merrill front
Portability
83
Imaging
56
Features
33
Overall
46

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2014
Sigma DP2 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 50mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
  • Released February 2012
  • Superseded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
  • Newer Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview

Let's look much closer at the Samsung WB35F and Sigma DP2 Merrill, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is pretty similar but the WB35F (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The WB35F was revealed 24 months after the DP2 Merrill which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the WB35F scores against the DP2 Merrill when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sigma DP2 Merrill

 WB35F DP2 Merrill 
ReleasedJanuary 2014February 2012More modern by 24 months

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Samsung WB35F

 DP2 Merrill WB35F 
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sigma DP2 Merrill

 WB35F DP2 Merrill 
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB35F has got outside measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Take a look at the Samsung WB35F and Sigma DP2 Merrill in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the WB35F and the DP2 Merrill.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB35F and DP2 Merrill is 93 and 83 respectively.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing specs. The picture here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WB35F and DP2 Merrill.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WB35F using its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung WB35F will deliver greater detail because of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer WB35F will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung WB35F
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Merrill
37
focusing manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
73
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (15MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Street photography camera
Sigma DP2 Merrill as a Street photography camera
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (194 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
65
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Merrill as a Sports photography camera
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
44
sensor resolution is decent (15 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (50mm)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB35F Travel photography information
Sigma DP2 Merrill Travel photography information
70
lighter than competitors in class (194 grams)
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
missing Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
54
sensor resolution is decent (15 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP2 Merrill as a Landscape photography camera
43
focusing manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
55
focusing manually
screen size is decent (3 inches)
sensor resolution is decent (15 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (50mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB35F Vlogging information
Sigma DP2 Merrill Vlogging information
31
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (194 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone jack
22
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external mic support
Photography Glossary

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB35F and Sigma DP2 Merrill
 Samsung WB35FSigma DP2 Merrill
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung WB35F Sigma DP2 Merrill
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2014-01-07 2012-02-08
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 15 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4704 x 3136
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) 50mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.1-6.3 f/2.8
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds -
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Continuous shutter rate - 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings - no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 640x480
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194 grams (0.43 pounds) 330 grams (0.73 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model BP70A -
Time lapse feature
Storage type MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC -
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $130 $931