Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Revealed April 2012
- Older Model is Sigma SD1
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Samsung and Sigma. The resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively comparable but the WB35F (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WB35F was announced 22 months later than the SD1 Merrill which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the WB35F matches up vs the SD1 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB35F & Sigma SD1 Merrill. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung WB35F Gallery & Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
WB35F | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | April 2012 | Fresher by 22 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung WB35F
SD1 Merrill | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sigma SD1 Merrill
WB35F | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung WB35F has outer measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has sizing of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the WB35F against the SD1 Merrill.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WB35F and SD1 Merrill is 93 and 57 respectively.
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB35F and SD1 Merrill.
As you can tell, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WB35F having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung WB35F will produce greater detail with its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer WB35F will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung WB35F | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung WB35F | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2012-04-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4800 x 3200 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 790 grams (1.74 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP70A | - |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $130 | $2,339 |