Clicky

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37
Samsung WB35F front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Revealed April 2012
  • Older Model is Sigma SD1
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Samsung and Sigma. The resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively comparable but the WB35F (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The WB35F was announced 22 months later than the SD1 Merrill which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the WB35F matches up vs the SD1 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 WB35F SD1 Merrill 
RevealedJanuary 2014April 2012Fresher by 22 months

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung WB35F

 SD1 Merrill WB35F 
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sigma SD1 Merrill

 WB35F SD1 Merrill 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung WB35F has outer measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has sizing of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).

Analyze the Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the WB35F against the SD1 Merrill.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WB35F and SD1 Merrill is 93 and 57 respectively.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB35F and SD1 Merrill.

As you can tell, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WB35F having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung WB35F will produce greater detail with its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer WB35F will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB35F Portrait photography features
Sigma SD1 Merrill Portrait photography features
37
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
65
focusing manually
good resolution (15MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no liveview feature
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Samsung WB35F Street photography factors
Sigma SD1 Merrill Street photography factors
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (194 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
57
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
environment proof
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB35F Sports photography features
Sigma SD1 Merrill Sports photography features
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
61
good resolution (15MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
environment proof
comes with phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB35F Travel photography advice
Sigma SD1 Merrill Travel photography advice
70
lighter than average (194 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
54
environment proof
good resolution (15 megapixels)
missing Timelapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB35F Landscape photography features
Sigma SD1 Merrill Landscape photography features
43
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
63
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
good resolution (15 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
environment proof
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
missing Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Vlogging camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Vlogging camera
31
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (194g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic jack
9
no video
Photography Glossary

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB35F and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Samsung WB35FSigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung WB35F Sigma SD1 Merrill
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2014-01-07 2012-04-10
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Dual True II
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 15 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4800 x 3200
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Number of lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds -
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings - no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194 grams (0.43 pounds) 790 grams (1.74 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model BP70A -
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $130 $2,339