Clicky

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A230

Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37
Samsung WB35F front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front
Portability
69
Imaging
50
Features
40
Overall
46

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A230 Key Specs

Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Sony A230
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 490g - 128 x 97 x 68mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • Previous Model is Sony A200
  • Successor is Sony A290
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A230 Overview

Lets look much closer at the Samsung WB35F and Sony A230, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the WB35F (16MP) and A230 (10MP) and the WB35F (1/2.3") and A230 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The WB35F was announced 4 years after the A230 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WB35F scores vs the A230 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony A230

 WB35F A230 
RevealedJanuary 2014May 2009Newer by 57 months

Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Samsung WB35F

 A230 WB35F 

Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony A230

 WB35F A230 
Manually focus More precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal display size
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB35F enjoys external dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony A230 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") along with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).

Take a look at the Samsung WB35F and Sony A230 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the WB35F vs the A230.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A230 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WB35F and A230 is 93 and 69 respectively.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by checking out a spec sheet. The pic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WB35F and A230.

Clearly, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WB35F with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung WB35F will show extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos more aggressively. The more recent WB35F should have a benefit in sensor technology.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB35F Portrait photography advice
Sony A230 Portrait photography advice
37
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
54
focusing manually
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
sensor resolution low (10MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Samsung WB35F Street photography advice
Sony A230 Street photography advice
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194g)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
67
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB35F Sports photography advice
Sony A230 Sports photography advice
40
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
46
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
bad battery (230 CIPA)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB35F Travel photography details
Sony A230 Travel photography details
70
lighter than competition (194 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (288mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
45
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse function
bad battery (230 shots)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung WB35F
Landscape photography with Sony A230
43
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
51
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no liveview
sensor resolution low (10MP)
bad battery (230 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB35F Vlogging info
Sony A230 Vlogging info
31
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
9
no video
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB35F and Sony A230
 Samsung WB35FSony Alpha DSLR-A230
General Information
Brand Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung WB35F Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2014-01-07 2009-05-18
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Available lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 2.7"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate - 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 10.00 m
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 194 gr (0.43 lbs) 490 gr (1.08 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 63
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 531
Other
Battery life - 230 shots
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP70A NP-FH50
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $130 $569