Clicky

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-C3

Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37
Samsung WB35F front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front
Portability
91
Imaging
57
Features
57
Overall
57

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs

Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Sony NEX-C3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
  • Released August 2011
  • Replaced the Sony NEX-3
  • Replacement is Sony NEX-F3
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview

In this write-up, we will be comparing the Samsung WB35F versus Sony NEX-C3, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the NEX-C3 (16MP) is relatively similar but the WB35F (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The WB35F was launched 2 years after the NEX-C3 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the WB35F grades vs the NEX-C3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony NEX-C3

 WB35F NEX-C3 
ReleasedJanuary 2014August 2011Newer by 29 months

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Samsung WB35F

 NEX-C3 WB35F 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony NEX-C3

 WB35F NEX-C3 
Manual focus More exact focusing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB35F has got exterior measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony NEX-C3 has dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Examine the Samsung WB35F versus Sony NEX-C3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WB35F vs the NEX-C3.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB35F and NEX-C3 is 93 and 91 respectively.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The picture here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WB35F and NEX-C3.

Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The WB35F has the tinier sensor which is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier. The fresher WB35F is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB35F Portrait photography details
Sony NEX-C3 Portrait photography details
37
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
74
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Street photography camera
Sony NEX-C3 as a Street photography camera
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (194 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
80
has a tilting screen
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lighter than average in class (225g)
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB35F Sports photography highlights
Sony NEX-C3 Sports photography highlights
40
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
53
good resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
better than average battery pack (400 per charge)
slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Travel photography camera
Sony NEX-C3 as a Travel photography camera
70
lighter than average (194g)
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
71
better than average battery pack (400 shots)
lighter than average in class (225g)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
no Time Lapse recording
does not posses selfie friendly display
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB35F Landscape photography details
Sony NEX-C3 Landscape photography details
43
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7")
no manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
70
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
good resolution (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
better than average battery pack (400 shots)
lack of image stabilization
no Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Samsung WB35F
Vlogging with Sony NEX-C3
31
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (194g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone port
27
lighter than average in class (225 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB35F and Sony NEX-C3
 Samsung WB35FSony Alpha NEX-C3
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung WB35F Sony Alpha NEX-C3
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2014-01-07 2011-08-22
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 3200 12800
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Amount of lenses - 121
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 6.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format - MPEG-4
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 194 gr (0.43 pounds) 225 gr (0.50 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 73
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.2
DXO Low light rating not tested 1083
Other
Battery life - 400 photos
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP70A NPFW50
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse feature
Storage type MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $130 $343