Clicky

Samsung WB35F vs Sony QX1

Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37
Samsung WB35F front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Samsung WB35F vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Released January 2014
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Released September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung WB35F vs Sony QX1 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Samsung WB35F and Sony QX1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Lens-style by competitors Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the QX1 (20MP) is fairly well matched but the WB35F (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) offer different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The WB35F was introduced 7 months prior to the QX1 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the WB35F grades vs the QX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony QX1

 WB35F QX1 
Display dimensions2.7""Larger display (+2.7")
Display resolution230k0kSharper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Samsung WB35F

 QX1 WB35F 
ReleasedSeptember 2014January 2014Newer by 7 months
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony QX1

 WB35F QX1 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Samsung WB35F vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB35F provides physical dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony QX1 has dimensions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Analyze the Samsung WB35F and Sony QX1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the WB35F compared to the QX1.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WB35F and QX1 is 93 and 90 respectively.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking specs. The pic here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB35F and QX1.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WB35F using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Sony QX1 will give greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged WB35F is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB35F vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB35F Portrait photography info
Sony QX1 Portrait photography info
37
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
66
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
includes face detect focus
exports RAW files
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung WB35F
Street photography with Sony QX1
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (194 grams)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
69
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
boasts focus by touch
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
heavier than others (216g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Sports photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Sports photography camera
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
56
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
great battery power (440 shots)
max frames per second very slow (4.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB35F Travel photography features
Sony QX1 Travel photography features
70
lighter than competitors in class (194g)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
lack of Timelapse function
does not feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.1)
71
great battery power (440 per charge)
boasts focus by touch
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (216 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung WB35F
Landscape photography with Sony QX1
43
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
64
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
great battery power (440 per charge)
tiny screen ( inches)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB35F Vlogging details
Sony QX1 Vlogging details
31
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (194 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not feature selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone jack
32
touchscreen enabled
includes face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have mic port
heavier than others (216 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung WB35F vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB35F and Sony QX1
 Samsung WB35FSony Alpha QX1
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB35F Sony Alpha QX1
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Lens-style
Released 2014-01-07 2014-09-03
Body design Compact Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 5456 x 3632
Highest native ISO 3200 16000
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 25
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.6
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" -
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 0 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed - 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings - Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194g (0.43 lbs) 216g (0.48 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 440 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model BP70A NP-FW50
Self timer - Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $130 $500