Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6600
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
77 Imaging
68 Features
96 Overall
79
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 503g - 120 x 67 x 69mm
- Revealed August 2019
- New Model is Sony A6700
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6600 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Samsung WB35F and Sony A6600, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Samsung and Sony. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the WB35F (16MP) and A6600 (24MP) and the WB35F (1/2.3") and A6600 (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WB35F was announced 6 years earlier than the A6600 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony A6600 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the WB35F matches up against the A6600 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6600 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB35F and Sony Alpha a6600. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung WB35F Gallery and Sony A6600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony A6600
| WB35F | A6600 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6600 over the Samsung WB35F
| A6600 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2019 | January 2014 | More modern by 68 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony A6600
| WB35F | A6600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus |
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6600 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB35F provides outer dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony A6600 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 69mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 503 grams (1.11 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB35F and Sony A6600 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the WB35F and the A6600.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WB35F and A6600 is 93 and 77 respectively.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6600 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing specs. The image here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WB35F and A6600.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WB35F with its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Sony A6600 will deliver greater detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged WB35F is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6600 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6600 Specifications
| Samsung WB35F | Sony Alpha a6600 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB35F | Sony Alpha a6600 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2019-08-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 32000 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 425 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 11.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction (On/Off selectable), Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 503 gr (1.11 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 120 x 67 x 69mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 82 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1497 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 810 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP70A | NP-FZ1000 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $130 | $1,198 |