Samsung WB35F vs Sony TX200V
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Samsung WB35F vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung WB35F vs Sony TX200V Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Samsung WB35F vs Sony TX200V, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is very close and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WB35F was released 24 months later than the TX200V making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the WB35F scores versus the TX200V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB35F vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB35F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung WB35F Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony TX200V
| WB35F | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 24 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Samsung WB35F
| TX200V | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony TX200V
| WB35F | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Samsung WB35F vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB35F has physical dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung WB35F vs Sony TX200V in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the WB35F and the TX200V.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WB35F and TX200V is 93 and 96 respectively.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB35F and TX200V.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Sony TX200V to result in more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The newer WB35F should have an edge in sensor technology.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung WB35F vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Samsung WB35F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB35F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2012-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lb) | 129 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP70A | NP-BN |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $130 | $500 |
