Samsung WB50F vs Sony A350
92 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Replacement is Sony A380
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Samsung WB50F vs Sony A350 Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Samsung WB50F and Sony A350, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB50F (16MP) and the A350 (14MP) is relatively close but the WB50F (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WB50F was launched 5 years later than the A350 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the WB50F grades vs the A350 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung WB50F vs Sony A350 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB50F and Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung WB50F Gallery and Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony A350
| WB50F | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 | June 2008 | More recent by 69 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Samsung WB50F
| A350 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony A350
| WB50F | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB50F has got physical measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony A350 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB50F and Sony A350 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the WB50F versus the A350.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB50F and A350 is 92 and 62 respectively.
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through technical specs. The visual here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WB50F and A350.
As you can tell, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WB50F featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Samsung WB50F will render extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher WB50F is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A350 Specifications
| Samsung WB50F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB50F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2014-01-07 | 2008-06-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 207 grams (0.46 lb) | 674 grams (1.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 595 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP70A | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $180 | $600 |