Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93366/9336655b16176ed18056f21b8b4fc3e901259e6e" alt="Samsung WB50F front Samsung WB50F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90dc9/90dc94a541028ea772791a0c7d7016eaa915f96a" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front"
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Revealed August 2012
- Old Model is Sony NEX-C3
- Renewed by Sony NEX-3N
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB50F (16MP) and the NEX-F3 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the WB50F (1/2.3") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The WB50F was launched 17 months after the NEX-F3 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the WB50F scores versus the NEX-F3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB50F & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung WB50F Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony NEX-F3
WB50F | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2012 | More modern by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Samsung WB50F
NEX-F3 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony NEX-F3
WB50F | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung WB50F provides exterior dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony NEX-F3 has sizing of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
See the Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the WB50F compared to the NEX-F3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c670f/c670f09253481ccd9af059ef72c986acf67d8b7e" alt="Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB50F and NEX-F3 is 92 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99826/998264cde889c48722308ca3225d7e0030d15167" alt="Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking specifications. The picture underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB50F and NEX-F3.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit different sensor sizes. The WB50F provides the tinier sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier. The more modern WB50F provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aecf/3aecfcf4ca4a953eb966e4a5fadb997ebf1276d5" alt="Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acead/aceadfce5b1d5fbb53319ea798b24fa4e6e51dd5" alt="Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Samsung WB50F | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB50F | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2012-08-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 207 grams (0.46 pounds) | 314 grams (0.69 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP70A | NPFW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $180 | $470 |