Clicky

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38
Samsung WB50F front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front
Portability
86
Imaging
57
Features
60
Overall
58

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs

Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Sony NEX-F3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
  • Revealed August 2012
  • Old Model is Sony NEX-C3
  • Renewed by Sony NEX-3N
Photography Glossary

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview

Lets look much closer at the Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB50F (16MP) and the NEX-F3 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the WB50F (1/2.3") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The WB50F was launched 17 months after the NEX-F3 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the WB50F scores versus the NEX-F3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony NEX-F3

 WB50F NEX-F3 
RevealedJanuary 2014August 2012More modern by 17 months

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Samsung WB50F

 NEX-F3 WB50F 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony NEX-F3

 WB50F NEX-F3 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung WB50F provides exterior dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony NEX-F3 has sizing of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).

See the Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the WB50F compared to the NEX-F3.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB50F and NEX-F3 is 92 and 86 respectively.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking specifications. The picture underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB50F and NEX-F3.

To sum up, the 2 cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit different sensor sizes. The WB50F provides the tinier sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier. The more modern WB50F provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB50F Portrait photography features
Sony NEX-F3 Portrait photography features
37
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
74
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung WB50F
Street photography with Sony NEX-F3
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (207 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
76
tilting screen
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB50F Sports photography factors
Sony NEX-F3 Sports photography factors
40
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
53
decent megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
better than average battery pack (470 shots)
max fps low (6.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB50F Travel photography info
Sony NEX-F3 Travel photography info
69
lighter than others (207 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long zoom (288mm)
no Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
69
better than average battery pack (470 CIPA)
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB50F Landscape photography features
Sony NEX-F3 Landscape photography features
47
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
70
focusing manually
change lenses (Sony E mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
decent megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
better than average battery pack (470 CIPA)
lack of image stabilization
does not have Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB50F Vlogging details
Sony NEX-F3 Vlogging details
30
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (207 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic socket
27
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
does not have microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB50F and Sony NEX-F3
 Samsung WB50FSony Alpha NEX-F3
General Information
Make Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB50F Sony Alpha NEX-F3
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2014-01-07 2012-08-16
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4912 x 3264
Highest native ISO 3200 16000
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 25
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Total lenses - 121
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 460k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed - 30 secs
Max shutter speed - 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 207 grams (0.46 pounds) 314 grams (0.69 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 73
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.3
DXO Low light score not tested 1114
Other
Battery life - 470 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model BP70A NPFW50
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse recording
Storage type MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Launch price $180 $470