Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
![Samsung WB50F front Samsung WB50F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB50F/Samsung-WB50F-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H300/Sony-H300-front.jpg)
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Introduced February 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Samsung WB50F versus Sony H300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB50F (16MP) and the H300 (20MP) is very similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The WB50F was unveiled at a similar time to the H300 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the WB50F scores against the H300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB50F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300. The full galleries are provided at Samsung WB50F Gallery & Sony H300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony H300
WB50F | H300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Samsung WB50F
H300 | WB50F |
---|
Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony H300
WB50F | H300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2014 | Similar age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB50F enjoys physical dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony H300 has proportions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") and a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB50F versus Sony H300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the WB50F vs the H300.
![Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300 size comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-WB50F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H300-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB50F and H300 is 92 and 63 respectively.
![Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300 top view buttons comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-WB50F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H300-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The picture here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WB50F and H300.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony H300 to offer you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively.
![Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300 sensor size comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Samsung-WB50F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H300-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder
![Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-WB50F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H300-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Samsung WB50F vs Sony H300 Specifications
Samsung WB50F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB50F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/3-5.9 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dot |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 8.80 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 207g (0.46 pounds) | 590g (1.30 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP70A | - |
Self timer | - | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $180 | $249 |