Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX1
92 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
79 Imaging
68 Features
57 Overall
63
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Introduced February 2013
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX1 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the WB50F (16MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the WB50F (1/2.3") and RX1 (Full frame) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WB50F was launched 11 months later than the RX1 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the WB50F scores vs the RX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB50F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The complete galleries are available at Samsung WB50F Gallery and Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony RX1
| WB50F | RX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 | February 2013 | More recent by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Samsung WB50F
| RX1 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Crisper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony RX1
| WB50F | RX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB50F has outer measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony RX1 has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Check out the Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the WB50F against the RX1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB50F and RX1 is 92 and 79 respectively.
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The graphic here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WB50F and RX1.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WB50F featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Sony RX1 will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern WB50F is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX1 Specifications
| Samsung WB50F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB50F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2013-02-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/2.0-22.0 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 207 gr (0.46 pounds) | 482 gr (1.06 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 93 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 2534 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 270 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP70A | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $180 | $2,798 |