Samsung WB700 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Samsung WB700 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed December 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Old Model is Sigma SD1
Samsung WB700 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Samsung WB700 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the WB700 (14MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is fairly similar but the WB700 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WB700 was announced 15 months earlier than the SD1 Merrill making them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WB700 grades against the SD1 Merrill with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung WB700 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB700 and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The whole galleries are available at Samsung WB700 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
WB700 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Sharper display (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung WB700
SD1 Merrill | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2012 | December 2010 | More modern by 15 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Samsung WB700 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
WB700 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Samsung WB700 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB700 has external measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 Merrill has proportions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung WB700 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the WB700 against the SD1 Merrill.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WB700 and SD1 Merrill is 98 and 57 respectively.
Samsung WB700 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The picture below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WB700 and SD1 Merrill.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WB700 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will deliver extra detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively. The more aged WB700 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung WB700 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB700 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung WB700 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung WB700 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2010-12-28 | 2012-04-10 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4800 x 3200 |
Highest native ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | - | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | () | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 614k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 790 gr (1.74 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $2,339 |