Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ffbf/8ffbfe3afe95f82bce5cd4eb18742effc86c819c" alt="Samsung WB750 front Samsung WB750 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0947/b0947af385e09995bd1e56c5e9e9356bb14ab574" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front"
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Released September 2011
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Announced October 2008
- Successor is Sony A99
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WB750 (13MP) and A900 (25MP) and the WB750 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The WB750 was released 2 years later than the A900 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the WB750 matches up versus the A900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB750 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung WB750 Gallery and Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Sony A900
WB750 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2011 | ![]() | October 2008 | More recent by 35 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Samsung WB750
A900 | WB750 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB750 and Sony A900
WB750 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB750 comes with external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony A900 has measurements of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the WB750 compared to the A900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e45d8/e45d8bcf0ca3a4987876dc4128b8cde5af65d1e8" alt="Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 size comparison Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB750 and A900 is 93 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecc72/ecc72a7bddedface83f63fe18c7bc45af2e902fe" alt="Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The graphic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WB750 and A900.
Plainly, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WB750 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A900 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent WB750 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb522/eb522c032c734c217b20a48f8e0b5a885b7bbee2" alt="Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6155/f6155677f23c9163193cac8389c33562a0d509c2" alt="Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Samsung WB750 vs Sony A900 Specifications
Samsung WB750 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB750 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2011-09-01 | 2008-10-22 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4096 x 3072 | 6048 x 4032 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.30 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193g (0.43 lbs) | 895g (1.97 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 880 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-10A | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Storage slots | One | Dual |
Launch price | $339 | $2,736 |