Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Released February 2014
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Samsung WB800F versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is pretty comparable but the WB800F (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WB800F was released 13 months prior to the DP2 Quattro which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the WB800F grades against the DP2 Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB800F & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The complete galleries are available at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
WB800F | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Samsung WB800F
DP2 Quattro | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | January 2013 | More modern by 13 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sigma DP2 Quattro
WB800F | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F has got outside dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check out the Samsung WB800F versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the WB800F against the DP2 Quattro.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and DP2 Quattro is 92 and 70 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and DP2 Quattro.
Clearly, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WB800F featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will show extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged WB800F will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung WB800F | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218g (0.48 lbs) | 395g (0.87 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $931 |