Clicky

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Samsung WB800F front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Samsung WB800F versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is pretty comparable but the WB800F (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) posses different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The WB800F was released 13 months prior to the DP2 Quattro which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the WB800F grades against the DP2 Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 WB800F DP2 Quattro 
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Samsung WB800F

 DP2 Quattro WB800F 
ReleasedFebruary 2014January 2013More modern by 13 months
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 WB800F DP2 Quattro 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F has got outside dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Check out the Samsung WB800F versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the WB800F against the DP2 Quattro.

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and DP2 Quattro is 92 and 70 respectively.

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and DP2 Quattro.

Clearly, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WB800F featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will show extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged WB800F will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB800F Portrait photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography details
44
has manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
77
has manual focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes face detect focus
saves RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Samsung WB800F Street photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography advice
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (218g)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
61
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
53
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
provides tracking focus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
48
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB800F Travel photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography details
69
lighter than others (218 grams)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
53
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
50
has manual focus
pretty wide (23mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
59
has manual focus
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB800F Vlogging info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging info
35
pretty wide (23mm)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (218g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
lack of mic socket
9
can't record video
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB800F and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Samsung WB800FSigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung WB800F Sigma DP2 Quattro
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2013-01-07 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TRUE III engine
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 23-483mm (21.0x) 45mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.9 f/2.8
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 460k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 16s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash options - no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 218g (0.48 lbs) 395g (0.87 lbs)
Physical dimensions 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - BP-51
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $300 $931