Samsung WB800F vs Sony A100
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
64 Imaging
48 Features
38 Overall
44
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 638g - 133 x 95 x 71mm
- Launched July 2006
- Superseded the Konica Minolta 5D
- Replacement is Sony A550
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB800F vs Sony A100 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Samsung WB800F vs Sony A100, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and A100 (10MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and A100 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WB800F was brought out 6 years after the A100 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony A100 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the WB800F matches up against the A100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB800F vs Sony A100 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB800F & Sony Alpha DSLR-A100. The entire galleries are available at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony A100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony A100
| WB800F | A100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | July 2006 | More modern by 79 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A100 over the Samsung WB800F
| A100 | WB800F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony A100
| WB800F | A100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A100 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB800F has got outer dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sony A100 has measurements of 133mm x 95mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.8") with a weight of 638 grams (1.41 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB800F vs Sony A100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the WB800F and the A100.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and A100 is 92 and 64 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A100 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and A100.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WB800F because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung WB800F will give extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more recent WB800F will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A100 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A100 Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2006-07-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 218g (0.48 lb) | 638g (1.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 133 x 95 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 61 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 476 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-FM55H |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $1,000 |