Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ca14/9ca142d32739840db34ee7f0cf455022f74377af" alt="Samsung WB800F front Samsung WB800F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d93c6/d93c6340561996445329eba0f2e50769f8f32759" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 front"
68 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Samsung WB800F and Sony A380, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the A380 (14MP) is pretty close but the WB800F (1/2.3") and A380 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The WB800F was launched 3 years after the A380 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony A380 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the WB800F matches up versus the A380 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB800F & Sony Alpha DSLR-A380. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony A380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony A380
WB800F | A380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 42 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A380 over the Samsung WB800F
A380 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony A380
WB800F | A380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F offers outside measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sony A380 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 519 grams (1.14 lbs).
Check the Samsung WB800F and Sony A380 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the WB800F compared to the A380.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a321/9a3217458f3a1f2938129b5500e49ffcadba0c05" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380 size comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and A380 is 92 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b546/5b546e4f3ade654c2bdf470095f9524691eaf6a3" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380 top view buttons comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The pic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WB800F and A380.
As you can see, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WB800F because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung WB800F will result in more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The newer WB800F should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8253/f8253383b6d2a1b2e52091820b2d417d51e7987e" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380 sensor size comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380 sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3f1b/a3f1bebc4b924e396c242993bf6188e8b7948593" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A380 Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2009-08-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lb) | 519 gr (1.14 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 614 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $899 |