Clicky

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Samsung WB800F front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
54
Overall
54

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 Key Specs

Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Sony A390
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Revealed July 2010
  • Succeeded the Sony A380
Photography Glossary

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Samsung WB800F versus Sony A390, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the A390 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the WB800F (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) use totally different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The WB800F was brought out 2 years after the A390 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the WB800F grades versus the A390 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony A390

 WB800F A390 
RevealedJanuary 2013July 2010Newer by 30 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Samsung WB800F

 A390 WB800F 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony A390

 WB800F A390 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and size. The Samsung WB800F enjoys external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

Look at the Samsung WB800F versus Sony A390 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the WB800F compared to the A390.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and A390 is 92 and 66 respectively.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The image underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and A390.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WB800F because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Samsung WB800F will give you extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher WB800F is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A390 as a Portrait photography camera
44
you can focus manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
72
manual focus
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
features face detection focus
supports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Samsung WB800F Street photography highlights
Sony A390 Street photography highlights
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (218g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
76
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung WB800F
Sports photography with Sony A390
53
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
60
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports phase detect auto focus
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
not so great battery pack (230 per charge)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung WB800F
Travel photography with Sony A390
69
lighter than competition in class (218 grams)
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
53
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
not so great battery pack (230 CIPA)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung WB800F
Landscape photography with Sony A390
50
you can focus manually
decently wide (23mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
61
manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
small screen (2.7 inches)
not so great battery pack (230 per charge)
no Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB800F Vlogging details
Sony A390 Vlogging details
35
decently wide (23mm)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (218g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
missing external microphone support
9
can't record video
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB800F and Sony A390
 Samsung WB800FSony Alpha DSLR-A390
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB800F Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2013-01-07 2010-07-28
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 23-483mm (21.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.9 -
Number of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Min shutter speed 16 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 218 gr (0.48 lb) 549 gr (1.21 lb)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 66
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 607
Other
Battery life - 230 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FH50
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $300 $500