Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A380
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Samsung WB800F versus Sony A390, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the A390 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the WB800F (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) use totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WB800F was brought out 2 years after the A390 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the WB800F grades versus the A390 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB800F and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony A390
WB800F | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | July 2010 | Newer by 30 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Samsung WB800F
A390 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony A390
WB800F | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and size. The Samsung WB800F enjoys external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB800F versus Sony A390 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the WB800F compared to the A390.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and A390 is 92 and 66 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The image underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and A390.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WB800F because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Samsung WB800F will give you extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher WB800F is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A390 Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2010-07-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lb) | 549 gr (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $300 | $500 |