Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5N
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
89 Imaging
56 Features
69 Overall
61
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
- Released October 2011
- Superseded the Sony NEX-5
- New Model is Sony NEX-5R
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5N Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5N, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the NEX-5N (16MP) is relatively similar but the WB800F (1/2.3") and NEX-5N (APS-C) come with different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WB800F was launched 16 months later than the NEX-5N which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the WB800F scores versus the NEX-5N in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5N Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB800F and Sony Alpha NEX-5N. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony NEX-5N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony NEX-5N
| WB800F | NEX-5N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | October 2011 | Fresher by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5N over the Samsung WB800F
| NEX-5N | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony NEX-5N
| WB800F | NEX-5N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5N Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB800F has got outer measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony NEX-5N has dimensions of 111mm x 59mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5N in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the WB800F versus the NEX-5N.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and NEX-5N is 92 and 89 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5N Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specs. The graphic here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WB800F and NEX-5N.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses the exact same MP albeit different sensor sizing. The WB800F features the tinier sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF more difficult. The fresher WB800F provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5N Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5N Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha NEX-5N | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha NEX-5N |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2011-10-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | Tilt Up 80°, Down 45° TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 77 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1079 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 460 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $300 | $550 |