Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX10
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
96 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX10 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Samsung WB800F and Sony QX10, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Lens-style by competitors Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the QX10 (18MP) is relatively close and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WB800F was launched 8 months before the QX10 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony QX10 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the WB800F grades versus the QX10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB800F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony QX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony QX10
| WB800F | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX10 over the Samsung WB800F
| QX10 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2013 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 8 months |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony QX10
| WB800F | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Samsung WB800F comes with exterior measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony QX10 has specifications of 62mm x 62mm x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB800F and Sony QX10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the WB800F compared to the QX10.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and QX10 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WB800F and QX10.
As you can see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Sony QX10 to render extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged WB800F will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX10 Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Lens-style |
| Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2013-09-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | - |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1440x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218g (0.48 lbs) | 105g (0.23 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $250 |