Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
53 Imaging
51 Features
77 Overall
61
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Released March 2016
- Earlier Model is Sony RX10 II
- Updated by Sony RX10 IV
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Samsung WB800F versus Sony RX10 III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the RX10 III (20MP) is pretty close but the WB800F (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WB800F was introduced 4 years before the RX10 III and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the WB800F grades vs the RX10 III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB800F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony RX10 III
| WB800F | RX10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Samsung WB800F
| RX10 III | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2016 | January 2013 | More recent by 39 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Clearer screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX10 III
| WB800F | RX10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB800F features exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony RX10 III has measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") and a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Check the Samsung WB800F versus Sony RX10 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the WB800F versus the RX10 III.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and RX10 III is 92 and 53 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The photograph below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and RX10 III.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WB800F using its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Sony RX10 III will provide you with greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older WB800F will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2016-03-29 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.4-4.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 14.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 218g (0.48 lbs) | 1051g (2.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 472 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 420 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $1,398 |