Clicky

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43
Samsung WB800F front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
51
Features
77
Overall
61

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Released March 2016
  • Earlier Model is Sony RX10 II
  • Updated by Sony RX10 IV
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III Overview

Let's look a bit more in depth at the Samsung WB800F versus Sony RX10 III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the RX10 III (20MP) is pretty close but the WB800F (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The WB800F was introduced 4 years before the RX10 III and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the WB800F grades vs the RX10 III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony RX10 III

 WB800F RX10 III 
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Samsung WB800F

 RX10 III WB800F 
ReleasedMarch 2016January 2013More recent by 39 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1229k460kClearer screen (+769k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX10 III

 WB800F RX10 III 
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB800F features exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony RX10 III has measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") and a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Check the Samsung WB800F versus Sony RX10 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the WB800F versus the RX10 III.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and RX10 III is 92 and 53 respectively.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Usually, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The photograph below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and RX10 III.

To sum up, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WB800F using its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Sony RX10 III will provide you with greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older WB800F will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Portrait photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Portrait photography camera
43
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
provides face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
70
you can focus manually
good megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
supports face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Samsung WB800F Street photography features
Sony RX10 III Street photography features
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (218g)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
63
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW formats
environment proofing
heavier than competition in class (1,051g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB800F Sports photography advice
Sony RX10 III Sports photography advice
52
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
69
incredible zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
good battery (420 shots)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Travel photography camera
69
lighter than average (218g)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (23mm)
long reach (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
55
good battery (420 shots)
environment proofing
good megapixels (20MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great reach (600mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (1,051g)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung WB800F
Landscape photography with Sony RX10 III
49
has manual focus
rather wide (23mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
63
you can focus manually
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW formats
environment proofing
good battery (420 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
missing Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB800F Vlogging factors
Sony RX10 III Vlogging factors
35
rather wide (23mm)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (218g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
lack of external mic port
28
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does have mic port
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
display is not selfie friendly
heavier than competition in class (1,051g)
Photography Glossary

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB800F and Sony RX10 III
 Samsung WB800FSony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung WB800F Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2013-01-07 2016-03-29
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 3200 12800
Max boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW support
Lowest boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 23-483mm (21.0x) 24-600mm (25.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.9 f/2.4-4.0
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.7
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 460 thousand dot 1,229 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 16 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Maximum quiet shutter speed - 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 14.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes - Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 218g (0.48 lbs) 1051g (2.32 lbs)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 70
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 472
Other
Battery life - 420 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $300 $1,398