Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ca14/9ca142d32739840db34ee7f0cf455022f74377af" alt="Samsung WB800F front Samsung WB800F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/970a0/970a0f286487b4657a35be8286808dada18de767" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II front"
89 Imaging
50 Features
74 Overall
59
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 281g - 102 x 58 x 38mm
- Introduced June 2013
- Earlier Model is Sony RX100
- Replacement is Sony RX100 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Samsung WB800F versus Sony RX100 II, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the RX100 II (20MP) is relatively close but the WB800F (1/2.3") and RX100 II (1") feature totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The WB800F was released 5 months before the RX100 II so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the WB800F matches up vs the RX100 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB800F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony RX100 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony RX100 II
WB800F | RX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 II over the Samsung WB800F
RX100 II | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX100 II
WB800F | RX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | June 2013 | Same age |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB800F provides external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony RX100 II has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") with a weight of 281 grams (0.62 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung WB800F versus Sony RX100 II in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the WB800F against the RX100 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fc9a/7fc9abe1ca837f1a40194f76853e6dca6d56b587" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II size comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and RX100 II is 92 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b73ca/b73cae771841c6927e46834025a887a53084ae58" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II top view buttons comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB800F and RX100 II.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WB800F due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Sony RX100 II will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/752b8/752b8e2d18665ea23402c36b6ebc30601a991297" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II sensor size comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98590/9859020eddb8230af10b82b9ac82925054b77f75" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 II Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2013-06-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | Xtra Fine WhiteMagic TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 15.00 m (ISO Auto (W)) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) | 281 gr (0.62 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 483 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec. / 2 sec. / Self-portrait One-person/ Self-portrait Two-person/ Self timer Continuous (3 or 5 shots)) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $598 |