Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
78 Imaging
76 Features
65 Overall
71
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 50 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
- Revealed October 2015
- Earlier Model is Sony RX1R
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Samsung WB800F versus Sony RX1R II, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and RX1R II (Full frame) come with different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WB800F was brought out 3 years earlier than the RX1R II and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the WB800F matches up against the RX1R II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB800F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony RX1R II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony RX1R II
WB800F | RX1R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Samsung WB800F
RX1R II | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2015 | January 2013 | More recent by 33 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 460k | Crisper display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX1R II
WB800F | RX1R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Samsung WB800F offers exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R II has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung WB800F versus Sony RX1R II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the WB800F against the RX1R II.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB800F and RX1R II is 92 and 78 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The visual below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB800F and RX1R II.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WB800F due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Sony RX1R II will give you more detail having its extra 26 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The older WB800F is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2015-10-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 42MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7952 x 5304 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 14cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 218g (0.48 pounds) | 507g (1.12 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 97 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3204 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2,5, 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $300 | $3,300 |