Clicky

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Samsung WB800F front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II front
Portability
78
Imaging
76
Features
65
Overall
71

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs

Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Sony RX1R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 50 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
  • Revealed October 2015
  • Earlier Model is Sony RX1R
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II Overview

Below is a detailed analysis of the Samsung WB800F versus Sony RX1R II, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and RX1R II (Full frame) come with different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The WB800F was brought out 3 years earlier than the RX1R II and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the WB800F matches up against the RX1R II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony RX1R II

 WB800F RX1R II 
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Samsung WB800F

 RX1R II WB800F 
RevealedOctober 2015January 2013More recent by 33 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1229k460kCrisper display (+769k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX1R II

 WB800F RX1R II 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Samsung WB800F offers exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R II has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).

Contrast the Samsung WB800F versus Sony RX1R II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the WB800F against the RX1R II.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB800F and RX1R II is 92 and 78 respectively.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The visual below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB800F and RX1R II.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WB800F due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Sony RX1R II will give you more detail having its extra 26 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The older WB800F is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II sensor size comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB800F Portrait photography details
Sony RX1R II Portrait photography details
44
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
features face detection focusing
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
85
you can focus manually
great flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
high MP (42MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
offers face detection focus
supports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Street photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Street photography camera
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (218g)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
73
has a tilting screen
big sensor size (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
very good high ISO (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competitors in class (507g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB800F Sports photography info
Sony RX1R II Sports photography info
53
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
63
high MP (42 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
offers tracking autofocus
supports phase detect auto focus
fixed focal length (35mm)
max frames per second very slow (5.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
bad battery pack (220 per charge)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB800F Travel photography factors
Sony RX1R II Travel photography factors
69
lighter than others (218 grams)
good resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
59
high MP (42MP)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
missing Time Lapse recording
bad battery pack (220 shots)
heavier than competitors in class (507 grams)
does not contain selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung WB800F
Landscape photography with Sony RX1R II
50
focusing manually
fairly wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
68
you can focus manually
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
high MP (42MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
no low pass filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (35mm)
lack of image stabilization
bad battery pack (220 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB800F Vlogging info
Sony RX1R II Vlogging info
35
fairly wide (23mm)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (218 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone port
34
very good max aperture (f2.0)
offers face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with external mic port
does not contain selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competitors in class (507 grams)
Photography Glossary

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB800F and Sony RX1R II
 Samsung WB800FSony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung WB800F Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2013-01-07 2015-10-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - BIONZ X
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 42MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 7952 x 5304
Max native ISO 3200 25600
Max enhanced ISO - 102400
Lowest native ISO 100 50
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 23-483mm (21.0x) 35mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.9 f/2.0
Macro focusing range - 14cm
Crop factor 5.8 1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 460 thousand dot 1,229 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Min shutter speed 16s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash settings - Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync - 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 218g (0.48 pounds) 507g (1.12 pounds)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 97
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 25.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.9
DXO Low light rating not tested 3204
Other
Battery life - 220 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-BX1
Self timer Yes Yes (2,5, 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots One One
Retail price $300 $3,300