Samsung WB800F vs Sony W310
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Samsung WB800F vs Sony W310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-112mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 137g - 95 x 55 x 19mm
- Launched January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung WB800F vs Sony W310 Overview
Following is a extended comparison of the Samsung WB800F vs Sony W310, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and W310 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WB800F was announced 3 years after the W310 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony W310 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the WB800F matches up vs the W310 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Samsung WB800F vs Sony W310 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB800F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony W310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony W310
| WB800F | W310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 37 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W310 over the Samsung WB800F
| W310 | WB800F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony W310
| WB800F | W310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony W310 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB800F features exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony W310 has dimensions of 95mm x 55mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
See the Samsung WB800F vs Sony W310 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WB800F against the W310.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and W310 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony W310 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and W310.
Clearly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to deliver more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent WB800F will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony W310 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung WB800F vs Sony W310 Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-01-07 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.0-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 218g (0.48 lb) | 137g (0.30 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 95 x 55 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $300 | $150 |