Clicky

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A37

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Samsung WB800F front
 
Sony SLT-A37 front
Portability
67
Imaging
57
Features
65
Overall
60

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A37 Key Specs

Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
Sony A37
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.6" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 506g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Launched May 2012
  • Earlier Model is Sony A35
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A37 Overview

Here, we will be analyzing the Samsung WB800F and Sony A37, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the A37 (16MP) is relatively well matched but the WB800F (1/2.3") and A37 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The WB800F was released 8 months later than the A37 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony A37 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting into a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the WB800F scores against the A37 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony A37

 WB800F A37 
LaunchedJanuary 2013May 2012More recent by 8 months
Screen size3"2.6"Bigger screen (+0.4")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A37 over the Samsung WB800F

 A37 WB800F 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony A37

 WB800F A37 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A37 Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and size. The Samsung WB800F provides exterior measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony A37 has specifications of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 506 grams (1.12 lbs).

Contrast the Samsung WB800F and Sony A37 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the WB800F vs the A37.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A37 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and A37 is 92 and 67 respectively.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A37 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A37 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at technical specs. The graphic below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WB800F and A37.

As you can tell, the two cameras feature the identical megapixel count albeit different sensor measurements. The WB800F comes with the tinier sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier. The younger WB800F should have an edge in sensor technology.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A37 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A37 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A37 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB800F Portrait photography details
Sony A37 Portrait photography details
44
you can focus manually
good resolution (16MP)
has face detect autofocus
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
74
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Samsung WB800F Street photography highlights
Sony A37 Street photography highlights
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (218 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
77
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
great high ISO (25,600)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB800F Sports photography information
Sony A37 Sports photography information
53
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
has tracking focus
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
61
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames per second)
low battery power (500 shots)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung WB800F
Travel photography with Sony A37
69
lighter than average (218 grams)
good resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (23mm)
long reach (483mm)
missing Timelapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
54
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low battery power (500 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB800F Landscape photography highlights
Sony A37 Landscape photography highlights
50
you can focus manually
quite wide (23mm)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
64
has manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.6 inch)
low battery power (500 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB800F Vlogging features
Sony A37 Vlogging features
35
quite wide (23mm)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (218 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly display
missing microphone support
35
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes external mic support
screen isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A37 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB800F and Sony A37
 Samsung WB800FSony SLT-A37
General Information
Make Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB800F Sony SLT-A37
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2013-01-07 2012-05-16
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 3200 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 23-483mm (21.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.9 -
Number of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.6 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 16 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 12.00 m
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 218 gr (0.48 pounds) 506 gr (1.12 pounds)
Physical dimensions 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 75
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.3
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.9
DXO Low light score not tested 799
Other
Battery life - 500 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $300 $522