Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony H200
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
67 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Launched January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony H200 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony H200, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. The image resolution of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the H200 (20MP) is very comparable but the DP2 Quattro (APS-C) and H200 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe DP2 Quattro was introduced 14 months later than the H200 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the DP2 Quattro scores versus the H200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony H200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma DP2 Quattro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are available at Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sony H200
| DP2 Quattro | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | January 2013 | More recent by 14 months | |
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| H200 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony H200
| DP2 Quattro | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Sigma DP2 Quattro provides outer dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has dimensions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Analyze the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony H200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the DP2 Quattro vs the H200.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the DP2 Quattro and H200 is 70 and 67 respectively.
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the DP2 Quattro and H200.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got the exact same resolution but not the same sensor measurements. The DP2 Quattro includes the larger sensor which should make getting shallower DOF simpler. The more modern DP2 Quattro is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Sigma DP2 Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma DP2 Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-02-13 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TRUE III engine | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 45mm (1x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 20cm |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 395g (0.87 lb) | 530g (1.17 lb) |
| Dimensions | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Battery type | - | AA |
| Battery ID | BP-51 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $931 | $250 |