Clicky

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX1

Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 front
Portability
67
Imaging
32
Features
36
Overall
33

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX1 Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Sony HX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1440 x 1080 video
  • 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
  • 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
  • Revealed April 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX1 Overview

Following is a complete overview of the Sigma DP2 Quattro versus Sony HX1, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Sigma and Sony. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and HX1 (9MP) and the DP2 Quattro (APS-C) and HX1 (1/2.4") boast different sensor sizing.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The DP2 Quattro was manufactured 4 years after the HX1 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the DP2 Quattro grades versus the HX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sony HX1

 DP2 Quattro HX1 
RevealedFebruary 2014April 2009More modern by 59 months
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 HX1 DP2 Quattro 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony HX1

 DP2 Quattro HX1 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Sigma DP2 Quattro provides physical dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Sony HX1 has measurements of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).

Look at the Sigma DP2 Quattro versus Sony HX1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the DP2 Quattro vs the HX1.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX1 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the DP2 Quattro and HX1 is 70 and 67 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX1 top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The pic underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the DP2 Quattro and HX1.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The DP2 Quattro featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will resolve extra detail due to its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more modern DP2 Quattro should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX1 sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
Portrait photography with Sony HX1
77
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
27
has manual focus
external flash not possible
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.4")
no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography advice
Sony HX1 Street photography advice
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
50
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is tiny (1/2.4")
no RAW files
heavier than competitors (544 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography highlights
Sony HX1 Sports photography highlights
48
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
36
great zoom range (28-560mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.4")
no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography features
Sony HX1 Travel photography features
53
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
48
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
very long zoom (560mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors (544 grams)
resolution not great (9MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
Sony HX1 as a Landscape photography camera
59
has manual focus
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
39
has manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.4")
no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging highlights
Sony HX1 Vlogging highlights
9
no video
22
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low res video (1440 x 1080 resolution)
does not have mic support
heavier than competitors (544 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony HX1
 Sigma DP2 QuattroSony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1
General Information
Brand Sigma Sony
Model Sigma DP2 Quattro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1
Class Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2014-02-13 2009-04-22
Physical type Large Sensor Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TRUE III engine Bionz
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.4"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.7mm 6.104 x 4.578mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 27.9mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 9MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5424 x 3616 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 45mm (1x) 28-560mm (20.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8 f/2.8-5.2
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 9.20 m
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1440x1080
Video data format - H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 395 grams (0.87 pounds) 544 grams (1.20 pounds)
Physical dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model BP-51 NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type - Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $931 $47,999