Clicky

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX300

Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
44
Features
51
Overall
46

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Revealed February 2013
  • Replaced the Sony HX200V
  • Successor is Sony HX400V
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX300 Overview

Below, we are matching up the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony HX300, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Sigma and Sony. The resolution of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is fairly comparable but the DP2 Quattro (APS-C) and HX300 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The DP2 Quattro was launched 12 months after the HX300 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the DP2 Quattro matches up against the HX300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sony HX300

 DP2 Quattro HX300 
RevealedFebruary 2014February 2013Newer by 12 months

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 HX300 DP2 Quattro 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution921k920kSharper display (+1k dot)

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony HX300

 DP2 Quattro HX300 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Sigma DP2 Quattro enjoys physical measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has sizing of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Examine the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony HX300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the DP2 Quattro and the HX300.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the DP2 Quattro and HX300 is 70 and 63 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by seeing technical specs. The pic here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the DP2 Quattro and HX300.

As you have seen, both cameras posses the exact same MP but different sensor dimensions. The DP2 Quattro contains the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field less difficult. The younger DP2 Quattro provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography features
Sony HX300 Portrait photography features
77
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
offers face detect focus
supports RAW formats
42
manual focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography info
Sony HX300 Street photography info
61
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
50
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
more heavy than competitors (623g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Sports photography camera
48
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
55
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
features tracking focus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography advice
Sony HX300 Travel photography advice
53
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
54
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (1200mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (623 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
Landscape photography with Sony HX300
59
manual focus
nice screen size (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
48
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging highlights
Sony HX300 Vlogging highlights
9
can't record video
25
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (623g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony HX300
 Sigma DP2 QuattroSony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Manufacturer Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma DP2 Quattro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Class Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2014-02-13 2013-02-20
Physical type Large Sensor Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TRUE III engine -
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 369.0mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 5424 x 3616 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 6400 12800
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 45mm (1x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8 f/2.8-6.3
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 920k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash settings no built-in flash -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 395 grams (0.87 lbs) 623 grams (1.37 lbs)
Dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID BP-51 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) -
Time lapse recording
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $931 $339