Clicky

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W290

Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
28
Overall
32

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W290 Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
Sony W290
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W290 Overview

The following is a extensive comparison of the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony W290, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Sigma and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and W290 (12MP) and the DP2 Quattro (APS-C) and W290 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The DP2 Quattro was unveiled 5 years after the W290 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony W290 being a Compact camera.

Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the DP2 Quattro scores versus the W290 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sony W290

 DP2 Quattro W290 
ReleasedFebruary 2014February 2009Newer by 61 months
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 W290 DP2 Quattro 

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony W290

 DP2 Quattro W290 
Manually focus More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Sigma DP2 Quattro has got outside dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Sony W290 has specifications of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Contrast the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony W290 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the DP2 Quattro versus the W290.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W290 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the DP2 Quattro and W290 is 70 and 94 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W290 top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by checking specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the DP2 Quattro and W290.

All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The DP2 Quattro with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will give more detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern DP2 Quattro should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W290 sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography details
Sony W290 Portrait photography details
77
manual focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with face detection focus
delivers RAW files
27
manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
Sony W290 as a Street photography camera
61
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
56
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography factors
Sony W290 Sports photography factors
48
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
lack of phase detect auto focus
25
image stabilization (Optical)
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography details
Sony W290 Travel photography details
53
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
57
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography features
Sony W290 Landscape photography features
59
manual focus
nice screen size (3 inches)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
41
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
no manual exposure
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging information
Sony W290 Vlogging information
9
can't shoot video
28
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone support
Photography Glossary

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony W290
 Sigma DP2 QuattroSony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
General Information
Brand Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma DP2 Quattro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
Category Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2014-02-13 2009-02-17
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TRUE III engine -
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 369.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5424 x 3616 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 45mm (1x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8 f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing distance - 10cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds 2 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.90 m
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 395 grams (0.87 lbs) 167 grams (0.37 lbs)
Dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID BP-51 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type - Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $931 $230