Sigma SD1 vs Sony H400
77 Imaging
55 Features
43 Overall
50
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Sigma SD1 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Revealed September 2010
- Replacement is Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Announced February 2014
Sigma SD1 vs Sony H400 Overview
Following is a extended review of the Sigma SD1 versus Sony H400, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Sigma and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the SD1 (15MP) and H400 (20MP) and the SD1 (APS-C) and H400 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SD1 was launched 4 years earlier than the H400 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Sigma SD1 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the SD1 scores against the H400 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sigma SD1 vs Sony H400 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma SD1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The complete galleries are viewable at Sigma SD1 Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 over the Sony H400
SD1 | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Sigma SD1
H400 | SD1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | September 2010 | More modern by 41 months |
Common features in the Sigma SD1 and Sony H400
SD1 | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Sigma SD1 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Sigma SD1 features external dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony H400 has dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") with a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Look at the Sigma SD1 versus Sony H400 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the SD1 and the H400.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SD1 and H400 is 77 and 62 respectively.
Sigma SD1 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The image underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SD1 and H400.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SD1 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Sony H400 will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 5MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SD1 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Sigma SD1 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma SD1 vs Sony H400 Specifications
Sigma SD1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma SD1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-09-21 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual True II | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 24 x 16mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 384.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 15 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4800 x 3200 | 5152 x 3864 |
Max native ISO | - | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | - | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | 2 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.4-6.5 |
Amount of lenses | 76 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 96 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 8.80 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 X 720 |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 628g (1.38 lb) |
Dimensions | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $2,339 | $268 |