Sigma SD1 vs Sony TX200V
77 Imaging
55 Features
43 Overall
50
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Sigma SD1 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Announced September 2010
- Replacement is Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced January 2012
Sigma SD1 vs Sony TX200V Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Sigma SD1 vs Sony TX200V, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Sigma and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SD1 (15MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is fairly comparable but the SD1 (APS-C) and TX200V (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SD1 was manufactured 16 months earlier than the TX200V making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Sigma SD1 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick overview of how the SD1 grades vs the TX200V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sigma SD1 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma SD1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are viewable at Sigma SD1 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 over the Sony TX200V
SD1 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Sigma SD1
TX200V | SD1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | September 2010 | Newer by 16 months | |
Display dimensions | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Crisper display (+770k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Sigma SD1 and Sony TX200V
SD1 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Sigma SD1 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Sigma SD1 has outer dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has sizing of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Sigma SD1 vs Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SD1 compared to the TX200V.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SD1 and TX200V is 77 and 96 respectively.
Sigma SD1 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The image underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SD1 and TX200V.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SD1 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony TX200V will provide extra detail due to its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged SD1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Sigma SD1 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma SD1 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Sigma SD1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma SD1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-09-21 | 2012-01-30 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual True II | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 24 x 16mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 384.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 15 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4800 x 3200 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | - | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Cross focus points | 2 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 76 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 96 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 129 gr (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $2,339 | $500 |