In-Depth Comparative Analysis: Sigma fp L vs Sony Alpha A7S – Which Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera Fits Your Professional or Enthusiast Needs?

Choosing a full-frame mirrorless camera can be a nuanced decision for photographers, given the diverse needs across genres and workflows. This comprehensive review evaluates two seemingly divergent models: the Sigma fp L (2021) and the Sony Alpha A7S (2014). Despite being released nearly seven years apart and positioned differently in the market, both cameras deliver compelling offerings for distinct use cases.

Drawing on extensive hands-on testing experience with both cameras - evaluating sensor performance, ergonomic design, autofocus capabilities, image-making versatility, and video functionality - I provide here an exhaustive comparison aimed at professionals and advanced enthusiasts seeking a camera that truly aligns with their photographic or videographic demands.

Understanding the Design Philosophy: Size, Build, and Ergonomics

Sigma fp L: Compact Precision

The Sigma fp L boasts a rangefinder-style mirrorless body with dimensions approximately 113 x 70 x 45 mm and weighs only 427 grams. Its compactness is one of its chief appeals, facilitating portability without compromising a full-frame sensor. The body’s minimalistic design philosophy emphasizes modularity over on-body controls, banking on touchscreen operation and external accessories to expand functionality.

Sony A7S: Traditional SLR Handling with Professional Ergonomics

Sony’s A7S, with a SLR-style mirrorless body measuring 127 x 94 x 48 mm and weighing 489 grams, feels bulkier and more substantial in hand. The larger grip and extensive physical control layout cater to users favoring tactile feedback and direct access to shooting parameters during fast-paced shooting scenarios.

Assessing Control Layout and Interface

The Sigma fp L features a pared-down control set, lacking illuminated buttons and favoring touchscreen focus and menu navigation. While this streamlines the camera’s visual footprint, it can introduce latency or usability hurdles in dynamic shooting, especially outdoor in bright conditions where touchscreen visibility is challenged.

Conversely, the A7S deploys a more conventional top-deck with dedicated dials and physical buttons, enhancing speed in settings adjustment. Additionally, its tilting 3.0-inch LCD with a lower 1230k-dot resolution contrasts with the fp L’s fixed 3.2-inch 2100k-dot touchscreen - offering better sharpness but less articulation flexibility.

Sensor Characteristics and Image Quality

Sensor Resolution and Technology

The Sigma fp L utilizes a 61MP full-frame BSI-CMOS sensor (36x24 mm, 864 mm²), a significant leap in resolution compared with the older Sony A7S, which sports a 12MP full-frame CMOS sensor (35.8x23.9 mm, 855.62 mm²). The fp L’s sensor capability translates to images up to 9520 x 6328 pixels, accommodating large print formats and extensive cropping latitude without severe quality loss. Its back-illuminated design also hints at improved light gathering.

In contrast, the A7S targets exceptional sensitivity over resolution. The 12MP sensor prioritizes pixel size, achieving remarkable low-light performance and extremely high ISO operation (up to ISO 409600), which remains staggering even by current standards.

Raw File Support and Processing

Both cameras offer raw support, but the Sigma fp L’s higher resolution files naturally demand more from processing pipelines and storage. Users should be prepared for longer post-processing durations and larger file sizes, impacting workflow logistics.

The Sony A7S’s lower resolution images facilitate quicker editing and file transfers while providing excellent noise control at high ISOs, enabling effective use in challenging light where the Sigma’s pixel density might face noise tradeoffs.

Autofocus System: Speed, Accuracy, and Usability

Sigma fp L’s Hybrid AF System

The Sigma fp L features 49 focus points employing phase-detection and contrast detection. Its autofocus includes face detection and live view AF modes like single, continuous, multi-area, and center-weighted. However, it notably lacks animal eye autofocus, a growing standard in recent cameras, which may inhibit wildlife or pet photographers.

While usable in portraits and controlled lighting, the autofocus system’s performance in high-speed tracking, such as sports or wildlife, is less evolved than more modern systems. Its 10 fps continuous shooting partially mitigates AF speed limitations but requires accurate focus tracking for optimal utility.

Sony A7S’s Contrast-Detection AF

Offering 25 focus points with contrast detection only (no phase detection), the A7S’s autofocus is comparatively modest. Yet its emphasis is on accuracy rather than speed. Its AF excels in video autofocus smoothness and low-light focusing owing to large pixel size and high sensor sensitivity.

The A7S handles face detection reliably but lacks the sophisticated tracking or eye AF available in later Sony models. Burst shooting is limited to 5 fps, which - while adequate for certain scenarios - lags behind the Sigma’s continuous frame rate.

Photography Disciplines: Performance across Genres

Portrait Photography

Sigma fp L:

• Strengths: With 61MP resolution, the Sigma captures nuanced skin textures and fine detail crucial for professional portraiture. Its Leica L-mount lens compatibility opens access to high-quality optics, facilitating beautiful sharpness and creamy bokeh.
• Weaknesses: No in-body image stabilization (IBIS) increases reliance on stabilized lenses or tripods. Autofocus performs adequately but lacks specialized eye or animal detection features, complicating fast-paced portrait sessions.

Sony A7S:

• Strengths: Although only 12MP, the A7S excels in capturing clean images at high ISO settings, perfect for event portrait calls under mixed and low lighting. Its slower autofocus and lower resolution can be drawbacks for studio work focused on print quality.
• Weaknesses: Older CMOS sensor results in less crisp images compared to contemporary standards. Lens ecosystem is rich but the reliance on contrast detection slightly slows focus acquisition.

Landscape Photography

Sigma fp L:

• The 61MP sensor offers ultra-high-resolution imagery capable of capturing intricate landscape textures and subtle tonal gradations. Its full 14+ stops dynamic range supersedes most older models, enabling retention of highlight and shadow details.
• Weather sealing adds ruggedness, crucial for outdoor photo excursions.
• The camera supports multiple aspect ratios and a variety of raw workflows, enhancing compositional flexibility.
• Lack of in-body stabilization means sturdy tripods remain essential for handheld landscape work.

Sony A7S:

• The 12MP sensor’s dynamic range at base ISO is commendable, but falls short against recent high resolution peers.
• Weather sealing exists but the older body design is bulkier and less compact for travel-heavy landscape shooters.
• Lower resolution constrains cropping and large format printing.

Sigma fp L front Sigma fp L screen back Sony A7S front Sony A7S screen back

Wildlife Photography

The Sigma fp L's autofocus range and frame rate (10 fps) provide reasonable utility but fall short for agile wildlife capture, especially combined with the absence of animal eye AF.

Meanwhile, the Sony A7S’s slower continuous rate (5 fps) and contrast detect AF inhibit performance but its exceptional high ISO sensitivity and low light autofocusing compensate when working in dawn or dusk conditions.

Lens ecosystems matter here: Sony’s E-mount supports 121 lenses, including specialized telephoto and super-telephoto glass, while Sigma’s L-mount supports fewer options but benefits from access to Leica lenses, favored for optical excellence.

Sports Photography

Both cameras face challenges for fast-action sports:

• Sigma’s higher fps is theoretically better for capturing sequences, but AF tracking limitations impair hit ratios.
• Sony offers more reliable AF but slower burst rates and less resolution hamper image detail in cropping.

For professional sports, neither camera competes strongly with more recent models designed for high-speed autofocus and buffering.

Street Photography

Sigma’s smaller size and weight grant it an advantage in discretion and portability for street work. The quiet shutter mode and minimalistic design reduce attention.

Sony’s larger form factor and distinct SLR ergonomics might be more obtrusive, though excellent low-light ISO capability enables shooting in dim urban environments.

Macro Photography

Neither camera has dedicated macro features, but Sigma’s high image resolution favors macro detail capture when paired with high-quality macro lenses.

Sony A7S’s lower resolution results in less sharpness at extreme close-ups despite effective stabilization with appropriate lenses.

Low Light and Night / Astrophotography

Sony A7S distinguishes itself through:

• Shockingly high ISO native range up to 409600.
• Low noise figures at elevated ISOs due to large photosites.
• Excellent video low light capture.
• Good manual controls and timelapse integration with downloadable apps.

Sigma fp L’s improved dynamic range and sensor size also offer capability but can’t reach Sony’s elevated peak sensitivity.

Video Capabilities

Both cameras support 4K video at 30 fps with external microphones and headphone jacks for audio monitoring.

• Sigma fp L:
  • Supports 4K UHD (3840x2160) up to 30p in H.264/MPEG-4.
  • Slow motion in Full HD up to 120 fps.
  • USB power delivery supports extended shooting.
  • No internal stabilization mandates stabilized tripods/gimbals.
• Sony A7S:
  • Offers 4K recording in XAVC S and AVCHD formats.
  • Slow motion 1080p up to 120 fps.
  • Tilting screen aids video framing.
  • Older USB 2.0 port limits data transfer speed.

The Sigma’s lightweight and advanced encoding options appeal to hybrid shooters, but the A7S’s video heritage remains significant for filmmakers emphasizing low light performance.

Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Durability

Both cameras feature environmental sealing to resist dust and moisture but lack full weatherproofing such as waterproof, shockproof, crushproof, or freezeproof certifications.

Sigma’s smaller, less bulky build may raise concerns about ruggedness in harsh conditions, although its metallic chassis provides decent resilience.

Sony’s bulkier body tends to feel more robust but at cost to weight and portability.

Battery Life and Storage Considerations

The Sigma fp L’s battery life manages approximately 240 shots per charge using the BP-51 battery, lower than many competitors, necessitating spare power sources for extended sessions.

Sony A7S extends battery life to approximately 360 shots with its NP-FW50 battery, a modest improvement but still below modern mirrorless averages.

Both provide a single SD card slot with UHS-II support (Sigma) and compatibility with Memory Stick formats (Sony), a crucial consideration for workflow management.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

Sigma’s Leica L-mount offers access to 40 native lenses as of early 2024, with ongoing expansion through collaborations and third-party manufacturers. This mount appeals to users focused on optical quality and manual focusing lenses.

Sony’s E-mount, established for over a decade, presents a vastly larger selection (121 lenses) spanning budget, professional, specialty, and cine lenses. This translates to remarkable versatility and adaptability for diverse shooting needs.

Performance Ratings and Value Proposition

While direct DxOMark testing for the Sigma fp L remains limited, its large sensor and modern design position it well above the Sony A7S in resolution and dynamic range metrics.

The Sony A7S holds an overall DxOMark score of 87, driven by exceptional low-light and dynamic range at its resolution class.

Pricing-wise, the Sigma fp L commands approximately $2500, reflecting its high megapixel sensor and modular design. The Sony A7S has an original MSRP near $2000 but now mostly only available second-hand or at reduced pricing.

Who Should Choose Which Camera?

Consider Sigma fp L if…

• You require ultra-high resolution for large prints, commercial, or fine art photography.
• You prioritize compact body size and modular video capabilities.
• You prefer Leica L-mount lenses or wish to explore manual focus techniques.
• You perform controlled studio, landscape, or product photography sessions.
• You are willing to manage shorter battery life and adopt external stabilization.

Opt for Sony A7S if…

• Your priority is supreme low-light sensitivity for events, weddings, and astrophotography.
• You value video functions with smooth autofocus in challenging lighting.
• You desire a more ergonomic body with plentiful physical controls.
• You require faster and more intuitive continuous shooting to capture fleeting moments.
• You want access to a mature and extensive lens ecosystem.

Final Verdict: Balancing Specialization vs Versatility

The Sigma fp L embodies a modern minimalist approach pushing high fidelity resolution in the smallest possible full-frame package, bearing appeal to professionals who accept certain operational caveats for exceptional image quality. However, its autofocus limitations and lack of IBIS restrict spontaneity and action shooting reliability.

The Sony A7S, although older, maintains relevance for genres where sensitivity and video performance trump resolution. It excels in low-light and hybrid shooting but is hindered by lower resolution and aging features.

Neither camera comprehensively covers all photographic needs equally well, making the choice intrinsically tied to specific workflow demands and shooting scenarios. Photographers invested in landscapes, portraits in controlled lighting, and high-res output may lean towards the Sigma, while event-driven artists, video creators, and astrophotographers often favor the Sony.

This authoritative comparison has aimed to provide exhaustive practical insights to empower photographers in making a well-informed purchase decision based on rigorous technical evaluation and real-world experience.

For further hands-on test results, sample workflows, and detailed lens recommendations, exploring manufacturer resources alongside third-party user communities is advisable prior to acquisition.

End of Article