Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A390
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
66 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Previous Model is Sony A380
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A390 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Sigma Quattro H versus Sony A390, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Sigma and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the Quattro H (45MP) and A390 (14MP) and the Quattro H (APS-H) and A390 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Quattro H was brought out 5 years after the A390 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Quattro H scores against the A390 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A390 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma sd Quattro H & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro H Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sony A390
| Quattro H | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 | July 2010 | Newer by 68 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Clearer display (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Sigma Quattro H
| A390 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro H and Sony A390
| Quattro H | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Sigma Quattro H comes with exterior dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony A390 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Contrast the Sigma Quattro H versus Sony A390 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Quattro H against the A390.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro H and A390 is 78 and 66 respectively.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out technical specs. The picture underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro H and A390.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Quattro H because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Sigma Quattro H will provide extra detail having its extra 31MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern Quattro H should have an edge in sensor technology.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2016-02-23 | 2010-07-28 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Dual TRUE III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-H | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 26.6 x 17.9mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 476.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 45 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 6200 x 4152 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Sigma SA | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Total lenses | 76 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,620k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.8fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | - | None |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 549g (1.21 lb) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $1,134 | $500 |