Sigma Quattro H vs Sony NEX-3N
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
89 Imaging
56 Features
52 Overall
54
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Released February 2013
- Superseded the Sony NEX-F3
- New Model is Sony a5000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Sigma Quattro H vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Here, we are looking at the Sigma Quattro H versus Sony NEX-3N, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Sigma and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the Quattro H (45MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the Quattro H (APS-H) and NEX-3N (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe Quattro H was announced 3 years after the NEX-3N which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the Quattro H scores vs the NEX-3N with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Sigma Quattro H vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma sd Quattro H and Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The whole galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro H Gallery and Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sony NEX-3N
| Quattro H | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | February 2013 | Newer by 37 months | |
| Display resolution | 1620k | 460k | Sharper display (+1160k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Sigma Quattro H
| NEX-3N | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro H and Sony NEX-3N
| Quattro H | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Sigma Quattro H enjoys outside dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has dimensions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Contrast the Sigma Quattro H versus Sony NEX-3N in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the Quattro H compared to the NEX-3N.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro H and NEX-3N is 78 and 89 respectively.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Quattro H and NEX-3N.
Clearly, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Quattro H having a larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Sigma Quattro H will deliver extra detail with its extra 29 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Quattro H is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2013-02-25 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Dual TRUE III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-H | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 26.6 x 17.9mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 476.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 45 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 6200 x 4152 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Sigma SA | Sony E |
| Number of lenses | 76 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,620 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.8 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 269 grams (0.59 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1067 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 480 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-61 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $1,134 | $399 |