Sigma Quattro H vs Sony WX300
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
94 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony WX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
- Launched February 2013
- Refreshed by Sony WX350
Photography Glossary Sigma Quattro H vs Sony WX300 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Sigma Quattro H and Sony WX300, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Sigma and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the Quattro H (45MP) and WX300 (18MP) and the Quattro H (APS-H) and WX300 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Quattro H was unveiled 3 years later than the WX300 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX300 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Quattro H scores against the WX300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Sigma Quattro H vs Sony WX300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma sd Quattro H & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300. The full galleries are available at Sigma Quattro H Gallery & Sony WX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sony WX300
| Quattro H | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 | February 2013 | More recent by 37 months | |
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 1620k | 460k | Clearer display (+1160k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Sigma Quattro H
| WX300 | Quattro H |
|---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro H and Sony WX300
| Quattro H | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Sigma Quattro H comes with exterior dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony WX300 has specifications of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Sigma Quattro H and Sony WX300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the Quattro H vs the WX300.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro H and WX300 is 78 and 94 respectively.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over specifications. The visual here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro H and WX300.
Plainly, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Quattro H with its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will deliver more detail having an extra 27 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher Quattro H is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony WX300 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2016-02-23 | 2013-02-20 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Dual TRUE III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-H | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 26.6 x 17.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 476.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 45MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 6200 x 4152 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-6.5 |
| Amount of lenses | 76 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.4 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,620 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.8fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.30 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Max video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 166g (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $1,134 | $330 |