Clicky

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A290

Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63
Sigma sd Quattro front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
47
Overall
51

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A290 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Sony A290
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Superseded the Sony A230
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A290 Overview

Following is a in depth review of the Sigma Quattro and Sony A290, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Sigma and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and A290 (14MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (APS-C).

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Quattro was introduced 5 years after the A290 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Quattro matches up versus the A290 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

				

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony A290

 Quattro A290 
ReleasedFebruary 2016June 2010More modern by 70 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1620k230kClearer display (+1390k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Sigma Quattro

 A290 Quattro 

Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony A290

 Quattro A290 
Manual focus More exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Sigma Quattro offers physical measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony A290 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

Take a look at the Sigma Quattro and Sony A290 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the Quattro against the A290.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A290 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro and A290 is 63 and 66 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes just by looking through specs. The picture underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Quattro and A290.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Sigma Quattro to result in extra detail using its extra 15MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent Quattro will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A290 as a Portrait photography camera
81
manual focus
megapixel count fantastic (29 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
65
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Sigma Quattro
Street photography with Sony A290
59
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
weather proof
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
more heavy than average (625g)
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sigma Quattro Sports photography highlights
Sony A290 Sports photography highlights
70
megapixel count fantastic (29 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather proof
sensor has phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.8 frames per second)
no image stabilization
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
max frames per second low (3.0 fps)
terrible battery power (290 shots)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Sigma Quattro Travel photography details
Sony A290 Travel photography details
55
weather proof
megapixel count fantastic (29 megapixels)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than average (625 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
53
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery power (290 per charge)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Sigma Quattro Landscape photography advice
Sony A290 Landscape photography advice
72
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
megapixel count fantastic (29MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
weather proof
no image stabilization
missing Timelapse function
58
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7")
doesn't have liveview
terrible battery power (290 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro Vlogging advice
Sony A290 Vlogging advice
22
comes with face detection autofocus
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great ( pixels)
missing external microphone socket
more heavy than average (625g)
9
no video
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro and Sony A290
 Sigma sd QuattroSony Alpha DSLR-A290
General Information
Brand Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma sd Quattro Sony Alpha DSLR-A290
Category Advanced Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2016-02-23 2010-06-09
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Dual TRUE III Bionz
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 29MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5424 x 3616 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount type Sigma SA Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 76 143
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 1,620k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x 0.55x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.8 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Highest video resolution - None
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 625 grams (1.38 lb) 549 grams (1.21 lb)
Dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 66
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 615
Other
Battery life - 290 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP-61 NP-FH50
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $738 $600