Sigma Quattro vs Sony A390
63 Imaging
67 Features
56 Overall
62
66 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released July 2010
- Old Model is Sony A380
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Sigma Quattro vs Sony A390 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A390, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Sigma and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and A390 (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (APS-C).
Photography GlossaryThe Quattro was launched 5 years after the A390 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Quattro grades against the A390 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Sigma Quattro vs Sony A390 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma sd Quattro and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The complete galleries are available at Sigma Quattro Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony A390
| Quattro | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | July 2010 | More modern by 68 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Sigma Quattro
| A390 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony A390
| Quattro | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Sigma Quattro has outer dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony A390 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A390 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the Quattro against the A390.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and A390 is 63 and 66 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through specifications. The pic here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Quattro and A390.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Sigma Quattro to show greater detail utilizing its extra 15 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern Quattro is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2016-02-23 | 2010-07-28 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Dual TRUE III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 29 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sigma SA | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Available lenses | 76 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 1,620k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Highest video resolution | - | None |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 625g (1.38 pounds) | 549g (1.21 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $738 | $500 |