Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-5T
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
89 Imaging
58 Features
79 Overall
66
Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-5T Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Introduced August 2013
- Old Model is Sony NEX-5R
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-5T Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-5T, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Sigma and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and NEX-5T (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (APS-C).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Quattro was launched 2 years after the NEX-5T which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Quattro scores against the NEX-5T when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-5T Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Alpha NEX-5T. The complete galleries are viewable at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony NEX-5T Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony NEX-5T
| Quattro | NEX-5T | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | August 2013 | More modern by 31 months |
| Display resolution | 1620k |  | 922k | Crisper display (+698k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5T over the Sigma Quattro
| NEX-5T | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony NEX-5T
| Quattro | NEX-5T | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-5T Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro offers exterior dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony NEX-5T has measurements of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-5T in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Quattro against the NEX-5T.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Quattro and NEX-5T is 63 and 89 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-5T Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing technical specs. The image below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Quattro and NEX-5T.
As you can tell, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Sigma Quattro to produce extra detail utilizing its extra 13MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively. The fresher Quattro should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-5T Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha NEX-5T | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
| Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha NEX-5T |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2013-08-27 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Dual TRUE III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 29 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 99 |
| Cross focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Sigma SA | Sony E |
| Amount of lenses | 76 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,620k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | Tilt Up 180° Down 50° TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.8 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (ISO100) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x1080 (60p/60i/24p) |
| Highest video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 625 grams (1.38 lbs) | 276 grams (0.61 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.0 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1015 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP-61 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes ((10/2 sec. delay), Self-timer (Cont.) (with 10 sec. delay; 3/5 exposures)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $738 | $400 |