Clicky

Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-6

Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63
Sigma sd Quattro front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-6 front
Portability
85
Imaging
57
Features
76
Overall
64

Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-6 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2016
Sony NEX-6
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 345g - 120 x 67 x 43mm
  • Launched March 2013
  • Replacement is Sony A6000
Photography Glossary

Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-6 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Sigma Quattro and Sony NEX-6, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Sigma and Sony. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and NEX-6 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (APS-C).

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Quattro was brought out 2 years later than the NEX-6 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Quattro matches up vs the NEX-6 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony NEX-6

 Quattro NEX-6 
LaunchedFebruary 2016March 2013More recent by 36 months
Screen resolution1620k921kSharper screen (+699k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-6 over the Sigma Quattro

 NEX-6 Quattro 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony NEX-6

 Quattro NEX-6 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-6 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro has external dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony NEX-6 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 43mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 345 grams (0.76 lbs).

Contrast the Sigma Quattro and Sony NEX-6 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the Quattro against the NEX-6.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-6 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Quattro and NEX-6 is 63 and 85 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-6 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-6 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The photograph here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro and NEX-6.

To sum up, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Sigma Quattro to offer you more detail having its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer Quattro will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-6 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-6 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
Sony NEX-6 as a Portrait photography camera
81
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is high (29MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
74
has manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes face detection focus
exports RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Sigma Quattro
Street photography with Sony NEX-6
59
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competition (625g)
78
has a tilting screen
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lighter than others in class (345 grams)
great high ISO (25,600)
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sigma Quattro Sports photography factors
Sony NEX-6 Sports photography factors
70
sensor resolution is high (29 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
includes tracking focus
environment proofing
supports phase detect autofocus
low frames per second (3.8 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
66
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Sigma Quattro Travel photography info
Sony NEX-6 Travel photography info
55
environment proofing
sensor resolution is high (29 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (625 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
75
lighter than others in class (345 grams)
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Sigma Quattro Landscape photography details
Sony NEX-6 Landscape photography details
72
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
sensor resolution is high (29 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
lack of image stabilization
lack of Timelapse function
75
has manual focus
change lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is decent (3")
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
no image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Sigma Quattro
Vlogging with Sony NEX-6
22
includes face detect autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video ( pxls)
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than competition (625g)
32
includes face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (345g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
does not have external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sigma Quattro vs Sony NEX-6 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro and Sony NEX-6
 Sigma sd QuattroSony Alpha NEX-6
General Information
Brand Sigma Sony
Model Sigma sd Quattro Sony Alpha NEX-6
Class Advanced Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2016-02-23 2013-03-25
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Dual TRUE III Bionz
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 29 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5424 x 3616 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 6400 25600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 99
Lens
Lens mounting type Sigma SA Sony E
Number of lenses 76 121
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,620k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - Xtra Fine LCD with Tilt Up 90� and Down 45�
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.8 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 6.00 m
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution - 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 625g (1.38 lbs) 345g (0.76 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 120 x 67 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 78
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.1
DXO Low light score not tested 1018
Other
Battery life - 360 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model BP-61 NPFW50
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images))
Time lapse feature With downloadable app
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $738 $365