Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and W220 (12MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and W220 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Quattro was unveiled 7 years after the W220 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Quattro grades against the W220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma sd Quattro and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220. The full galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro Gallery and Sony W220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony W220
Quattro | W220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | January 2009 | More modern by 87 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Crisper display (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Sigma Quattro
W220 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony W220
Quattro | W220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Sigma Quattro has got physical dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony W220 has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the Quattro and the W220.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and W220 is 63 and 95 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by checking technical specs. The image below will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Quattro and W220.
As you can tell, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Quattro using its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Sigma Quattro will give more detail having an extra 17 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern Quattro is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TRUE III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-7.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 76 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,620 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.8 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
Max video resolution | - | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 625 grams (1.38 pounds) | 147 grams (0.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | BP-61 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $738 | $160 |