Clicky

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220

Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63
Sigma sd Quattro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Introduced February 2016
Sony W220
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
  • 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 Overview

Following is a in-depth analysis of the Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and W220 (12MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and W220 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Quattro was unveiled 7 years after the W220 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Quattro grades against the W220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony W220

 Quattro W220 
LaunchedFebruary 2016January 2009More modern by 87 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1620k230kCrisper display (+1390k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Sigma Quattro

 W220 Quattro 

Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony W220

 Quattro W220 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Sigma Quattro has got physical dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony W220 has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).

Check out the Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the Quattro and the W220.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and W220 is 63 and 95 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by checking technical specs. The image below will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Quattro and W220.

As you can tell, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Quattro using its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Sigma Quattro will give more detail having an extra 17 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern Quattro is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma Quattro Portrait photography advice
Sony W220 Portrait photography advice
81
focusing manually
megapixel count amazing (29MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
27
manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Sigma Quattro Street photography advice
Sony W220 Street photography advice
59
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competitors in class (625 grams)
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Sigma Quattro
Sports photography with Sony W220
70
megapixel count amazing (29 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
max frames per second low (3.8 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Sigma Quattro
Travel photography with Sony W220
55
environment sealing
megapixel count amazing (29 megapixels)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors in class (625g)
display is not selfie friendly
51
has built in flash
no Time Lapse recording
MP count low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (30mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Sigma Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
Sony W220 as a Landscape photography camera
72
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
nice screen size (3")
megapixel count amazing (29 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
lack of image stabilization
no Timelapse recording
32
manual focus
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (30mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro as a Vlogging camera
Sony W220 as a Vlogging camera
22
provides face detect autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video ( pxls)
no microphone support
more heavy than competitors in class (625g)
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (30mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro and Sony W220
 Sigma sd QuattroSony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
General Information
Company Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma sd Quattro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2016-02-23 2009-01-08
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Dual TRUE III -
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 29 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5424 x 3616 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount type Sigma SA fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 30-120mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-7.1
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Amount of lenses 76 -
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 1,620 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.8 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 7.10 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps)
Max video resolution - 640x480
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 625 grams (1.38 pounds) 147 grams (0.32 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID BP-61 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $738 $160