Sigma Quattro vs Sony W370
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
94 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
- 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2010
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W370 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Sigma Quattro versus Sony W370, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and W370 (14MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and W370 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Quattro was manufactured 6 years later than the W370 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W370 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Quattro matches up versus the W370 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W370 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370. The entire galleries are viewable at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony W370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony W370
Quattro | W370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | January 2010 | Fresher by 75 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W370 over the Sigma Quattro
W370 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony W370
Quattro | W370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W370 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Sigma Quattro has got outside measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony W370 has specifications of 100mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Sigma Quattro versus Sony W370 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the Quattro vs the W370.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and W370 is 63 and 94 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W370 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by going through technical specs. The visual underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Quattro and W370.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Quattro featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Sigma Quattro will provide extra detail due to its extra 15 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The newer Quattro provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W370 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W370 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2016-02-23 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Dual TRUE III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 34-238mm (7.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.6-5.6 |
Total lenses | 76 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,620 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 625g (1.38 pounds) | 179g (0.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP-61 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $738 | $230 |