Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX300
63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63
94 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Replacement is Sony WX350
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX300 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX300, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Sigma and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and WX300 (18MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and WX300 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Quattro was manufactured 3 years after the WX300 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX300 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Quattro matches up versus the WX300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300. The entire galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony WX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony WX300
| Quattro | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 | February 2013 | More modern by 37 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 460k | Sharper screen (+1160k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Sigma Quattro
| WX300 | Quattro |
|---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony WX300
| Quattro | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Sigma Quattro provides outer dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony WX300 has sizing of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Quattro compared to the WX300.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro and WX300 is 63 and 94 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro and WX300.
As you can tell, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Quattro due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sigma Quattro will give you greater detail due to its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher Quattro will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX300 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 |
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2016-02-23 | 2013-02-20 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Dual TRUE III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 29 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-6.5 |
| Amount of lenses | 76 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,620k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.30 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 625g (1.38 lbs) | 166g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $738 | $330 |