Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX9
63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63


99 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- n/ag - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2011

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX9 Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX9, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Sigma and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and WX9 (16MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and WX9 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.

The Quattro was introduced 5 years later than the WX9 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Quattro matches up vs the WX9 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX9 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma sd Quattro and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9. The whole galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro Gallery and Sony WX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony WX9
Quattro | WX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 63 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 921k | Sharper screen (+699k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony WX9 over the Sigma Quattro
WX9 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony WX9
Quattro | WX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Sigma Quattro has got exterior measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony WX9 has specifications of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX9 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the Quattro and the WX9.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Quattro and WX9 is 63 and 99 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX9 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out specs. The visual underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Quattro and WX9.
All in all, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Quattro using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sigma Quattro will show extra detail using its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger Quattro is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX9 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX9 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Dual TRUE III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.6-6.3 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 76 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,620k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | XtraFine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.8fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.30 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 625 gr (1.38 lbs) | - |
Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP-61 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $738 | $188 |