Sony A200 vs Sony A33
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
67 Imaging
54 Features
80 Overall
64
Sony A200 vs Sony A33 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Introduced July 2008
- Later Model is Sony A230
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Released August 2010
- Successor is Sony A35
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Sony A200 vs Sony A33 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Sony A200 vs Sony A33, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras and they are both designed by Sony. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the A200 (10MP) and A33 (14MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (APS-C).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe A200 was announced 3 years before the A33 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the A200 grades vs the A33 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Sony A200 vs Sony A33 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 & Sony SLT-A33. The whole galleries are available at Sony A200 Gallery & Sony A33 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Sony A33
| A200 | A33 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A33 over the Sony A200
| A33 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 |  | July 2008 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Sony A200 and Sony A33
| A200 | A33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Sony A200 vs Sony A33 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Sony A200 provides exterior dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs) while the Sony A33 has measurements of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Look at the Sony A200 vs Sony A33 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the A200 versus the A33.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the A200 and A33 is 66 and 67 respectively.
Sony A200 vs Sony A33 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing merely by viewing specs. The photograph here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the A200 and A33.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Sony A33 to render more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older A200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Sony A200 vs Sony A33 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Sony A200 vs Sony A33 Specifications
| Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | Sony SLT-A33 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Sony | Sony |
| Model type | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | Sony SLT-A33 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2008-07-17 | 2010-08-24 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 15 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sony/Minolta Alpha | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 143 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.55x | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 572 grams (1.26 lbs) | 500 grams (1.10 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 63 | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.3 | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | 521 | 591 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $100 | $230 |