Sony A350 vs Sony TX9
62 Imaging
53 Features
47 Overall
50
95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Sony A350 vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Announced June 2008
- Later Model is Sony A380
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Announced July 2010
Sony A350 vs Sony TX9 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Sony A350 vs Sony TX9, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both sold by Sony. The resolution of the A350 (14MP) and the TX9 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the A350 (APS-C) and TX9 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe A350 was introduced 3 years before the TX9 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the A350 matches up vs the TX9 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sony A350 vs Sony TX9 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The whole galleries are provided at Sony A350 Gallery & Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Sony TX9
A350 | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Sony A350
TX9 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | June 2008 | More modern by 25 months | |
Display dimension | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Sony A350 and Sony TX9
A350 | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Sony A350 vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Sony A350 offers exterior measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs) while the Sony TX9 has measurements of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Sony A350 vs Sony TX9 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the A350 against the TX9.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A350 and TX9 is 62 and 95 respectively.
Sony A350 vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The image here should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the A350 and TX9.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The A350 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Sony A350 will resolve extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged A350 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Sony A350 vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony A350 vs Sony TX9 Specifications
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2008-06-06 | 2010-07-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4592 x 3056 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sony/Minolta Alpha | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 143 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3.5" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.49x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 674 grams (1.49 lb) | 149 grams (0.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 65 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 595 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $600 | $799 |