Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony S950
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony S950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Old Model is Sony NEX-3
- Renewed by Sony NEX-F3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Video
- 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
- Revealed February 2009
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony S950 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony S950, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Sony. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the NEX-C3 (16MP) and S950 (10MP) and the NEX-C3 (APS-C) and S950 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe NEX-C3 was revealed 2 years after the S950 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony S950 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the NEX-C3 matches up vs the S950 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony S950 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sony Alpha NEX-C3 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950. The full galleries are viewable at Sony NEX-C3 Gallery and Sony S950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Sony S950
NEX-C3 | S950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2011 | February 2009 | Newer by 31 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S950 over the Sony NEX-C3
S950 | NEX-C3 |
---|
Common features in the Sony NEX-C3 and Sony S950
NEX-C3 | S950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony S950 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Sony NEX-C3 enjoys exterior measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony S950 has specifications of 93mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony S950 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the NEX-C3 against the S950.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the NEX-C3 and S950 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony S950 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing technical specs. The image below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the NEX-C3 and S950.
As you have seen, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The NEX-C3 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Sony NEX-C3 will produce greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more recent NEX-C3 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony S950 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony S950 Specifications
Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-08-22 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Bionz | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.4 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 365.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4912 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Sony E | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Available lenses | 121 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Xtra Fine LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1083 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NPFW50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $343 | $130 |