Sony H300 vs Sony A35
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
69 Imaging
57 Features
70 Overall
62
Sony H300 vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Sony H300 vs Sony A35 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Sony H300 vs Sony A35, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR and both of them are sold by Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the H300 (20MP) and A35 (16MP) and the H300 (1/2.3") and A35 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe H300 was introduced 2 years after the A35 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the H300 matches up against the A35 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Sony H300 vs Sony A35 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 & Sony SLT-A35. The whole galleries are provided at Sony H300 Gallery & Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Sony A35
| H300 | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | September 2011 | More modern by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Sony H300
| A35 | H300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Sony H300 and Sony A35
| H300 | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Sony H300 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Sony H300 offers outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") accompanied by a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs) and the Sony A35 has measurements of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Sony H300 vs Sony A35 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the H300 versus the A35.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the H300 and A35 is 63 and 69 respectively.
Sony H300 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The image here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the H300 and A35.
To sum up, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The H300 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony H300 will offer greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent H300 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Sony H300 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Sony H300 vs Sony A35 Specifications
| Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | Sony SLT-A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
| Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | Sony SLT-A35 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2014-02-13 | 2011-09-20 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Bionz(R) | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 25-875mm (35.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3-5.9 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Clear Photo LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | 1,150k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.80 m | 12.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 590 grams (1.30 pounds) | 415 grams (0.91 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 763 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 440 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $249 | $598 |
