Sony HX1 vs Sony W320
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Sony HX1 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Launched April 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
Sony HX1 vs Sony W320 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Sony HX1 and Sony W320, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact and both are offered by Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the HX1 (9MP) and W320 (14MP) and the HX1 (1/2.4") and W320 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe HX1 was revealed 8 months before the W320 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the HX1 scores versus the W320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sony HX1 vs Sony W320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The full galleries are available at Sony HX1 Gallery and Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Sony W320
HX1 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Sony HX1
W320 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | April 2009 | More modern by 8 months |
Common features in the Sony HX1 and Sony W320
HX1 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Sony HX1 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Sony HX1 enjoys external dimensions of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs) and the Sony W320 has sizing of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Sony HX1 and Sony W320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the HX1 against the W320.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the HX1 and W320 is 67 and 97 respectively.
Sony HX1 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through specifications. The image here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the HX1 and W320.
Plainly, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The HX1 having a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Sony W320 will give extra detail because of its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged HX1 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Sony HX1 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony HX1 vs Sony W320 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-04-22 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Bionz | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.4" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.104 x 4.578mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-560mm (20.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.2 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.20 m | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1440x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 544 grams (1.20 lb) | 117 grams (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-FH50 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $47,999 | $269 |