Sony HX300 vs Sony W350
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
97 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Sony HX300 vs Sony W350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Released February 2013
- Succeeded the Sony HX200V
- Replacement is Sony HX400V
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Sony HX300 vs Sony W350 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Sony HX300 vs Sony W350, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both manufactured by Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the HX300 (20MP) and W350 (14MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe HX300 was introduced 3 years after the W350 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony W350 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the HX300 matches up versus the W350 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sony HX300 vs Sony W350 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350. The whole galleries are viewable at Sony HX300 Gallery & Sony W350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Sony W350
HX300 | W350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | January 2010 | More modern by 38 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Sony HX300
W350 | HX300 |
---|
Common features in the Sony HX300 and Sony W350
HX300 | W350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Sony HX300 vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Sony HX300 features physical dimensions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs) and the Sony W350 has sizing of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") along with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Sony HX300 vs Sony W350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the HX300 and the W350.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the HX300 and W350 is 63 and 97 respectively.
Sony HX300 vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through specifications. The pic here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the HX300 and W350.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Sony HX300 to give you greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher HX300 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Sony HX300 vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony HX300 vs Sony W350 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2013-02-20 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.3 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.80 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 623 grams (1.37 lbs) | 117 grams (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") | 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $339 | $200 |